Pterostylis macilenta

2 Bellfield, VIC

Pterostylis macilenta at Bellfield, VIC - 16 Oct 2023
Pterostylis macilenta at Bellfield, VIC - 16 Oct 2023
Pterostylis macilenta at Bellfield, VIC - 16 Oct 2023
Pterostylis macilenta at Bellfield, VIC - 16 Oct 2023
Pterostylis macilenta at Bellfield, VIC - 16 Oct 2023
Request use of media

Identification history

Pterostylis macilenta 17 Oct 2023 natureguy
Pterostylis macilenta 16 Oct 2023 natureguy
Pterostylis sp. 16 Oct 2023 AnneG1

Identify this sighting


Please Login or Register to identify this sighting.

User's notes

2 plants, 1 with spent flowers. At around 20cm tall at 675m altitude growing next to granite on top of a lookout. Only 3 flowers. I think this is Pterostylis macilenta as described in the Guide to Native Orchids of Victoria (G.Backhouse). It had a very bristly labellum. Other choice is P.melagramma.

5 comments

natureguy wrote:
   16 Oct 2023
It's not one I'm particularly familiar with but I think you're right that the very hairy labellum sets this apart as P. macilenta, a nice one too as it's endemic to the Grampians
Tapirlord wrote:
   17 Oct 2023
Yes, P.macilenta or..........Bunochilus mcalinetus. We need to sort out our use of extended pterostylis. Noting that this species was described as Bunochilus maclinetus.
natureguy wrote:
   17 Oct 2023
On the Canberra platform we use Bunochilus I think but Vicflora lists Pterostylis.
Tapirlord wrote:
   17 Oct 2023
Yes, I am aware of that. My point goes to the fact that numerous species are found within multiple platform boundaries, and hence this dual name acceptance is confusing. For instance "Bunochilus montanus" (Montane Leafy Greenhood) is a name used on CNM, but if we were to find the same species here we would call it Pterostylis jonesii (at least according to Vicflora). It's not a good solution to maintain both names and hence we need to commit one way or the other. Personally, I think we should use extended Pterostylis, there is good morphological and Genetic evidence for this. I think the reason that many of these names are not more broadly accepted is because of dislike for the work of David Jones more than anything else.
natureguy wrote:
   17 Oct 2023
Yeah that sounds good to me, happy to work through that change at some point soon (theres a few other taxonomy changes to get around to as well).

Please Login or Register to comment.

Location information

Sighting information

  • 3 Abundance
  • 16 Oct 2023 12:47 PM Recorded on
  • AnneG1 Recorded by

Additional information

  • 10cm to 30cm Plant height
  • True In flower

Species information

  • Pterostylis macilenta Scientific name
  • Common name
  • Sensitive
  • Rare or uncommon native
  • Non-Invasive
  • Machine learning
  • In flower

Record quality

  • Images or audio
  • More than one media file
  • Confirmed by an expert moderator
  • Nearby sighting(s) of same species
  • GPS evidence of location
  • Description
  • Additional attributes
2,155,624 sightings of 19,966 species in 6,515 locations from 11,523 contributors
CCA 3.0 | privacy
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of this land and acknowledge their continuing connection to their culture. We pay our respects to their Elders past and present.